Ray Kelly: Too Much Respect
October 31, 2011
Other than Ray Kelly, what police commissioner on God’s green earth could keep his job after the avalanche of police scandals in New York City last week?
Eight current and former NYPD cops were charged in federal court with accepting thousands of dollars in cash to smuggle M-16 rifles and handguns into the state.
A narcotics detective on trial in Brooklyn was accused with colleagues of planting drugs or lying under oath. These alleged crimes led to the arrests of eight other officers, the dismissal of hundreds of drug cases and the payouts of more than $1 million in taxpayer money to settle false arrests lawsuits.
The 50-bullet salvo of police gunfire that killed Sean Bell, an unarmed black man, was also back in the headlines.
The officers who shot the unarmed Bell and two of his friends, a tragedy resulting in a $7-million taxpayer-funded settlement, testified during departmental trials at Police Plaza.
As if all this wasn’t enough, last Friday, 16 cops were indicted in a Bronx ticket-fixing scheme, which revealed a crooked culture of NYPD favoritism that has apparently existed since the invention of the automobile.
Yet despite these seemingly never-ending scandals, Commissioner Ray Kelly appears able to shield himself from blame. Soon, he’ll be the longest serving police commissioner in city history. He’s already the most powerful, and is considered a possible mayoral candidate for 2013.
Should he choose not to run, there is even the chance he may be reappointed police commissioner. City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, the early front runner, has said that she would be “honored” for him to remain.
So how does Kelly do it? It starts with Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
No mayor in recent history has abdicated his responsibilities in supervising the police department and his police commissioner as has Bloomberg.
Despite Bloomberg’s campaign promises and criticism of his predecessor Rudolph Giuliani for lack of departmental transparency, there is less transparency now under Kelly than under Giuliani. Under Mayor Mike, there is also no civilian supervision.
A possible equal to Bloomberg in abdicating mayoral responsibilities was David Dinkins.
He seemed unaware of the department’s bifurcated chain of command at the highest levels, so that when catastrophe struck — in the form of the Crown Heights riots — no one was in command.
Those riots were sparked when a Hasidic driver in a city-sanctioned motorcade escorting the grand rebbe ran a red light and fatally struck a black child. They culminated in the retaliatory stabbing of a Jewish rabbinical student by a black mob. The weak police response cost Dinkins re-election.
Second, there is the compliant media, reflected in the cheerleading editorials of the Daily News. That was the paper with the once-proud motto, to contrast it with the Post, “The City’s Honest Voice.”
That motto is as dead as the dodo.
After the eight cops were indicted for gun-running, the News pooh-poohed their crimes.
“Not to minimize their alleged offenses,” it editorialized, “but it must be noted that the stated crimes did not involve abuse of the badge or misuse of official power.”
The cops, the News continued, “pulled down a grand total of less than $20,000 for essentially serving as deliverymen.” The News called this “chump change.”
“If this is the worst the NYPD has to offer — and there’s been nothing more serious for a while — New Yorkers can count themselves as pretty lucky,” the editorial concluded.
Such nonsense, in place of journalism, apparently stems from the News’ financial decline and its hiring of a second-rate editor in chief.
It is also due to the paper’s post 9/11 swoon, making it unable to report critically about Kelly. The commissioner and Deputy Commissioner for Intelligence David Cohen have apparently convinced News’s owner, Mortimer Zuckerman, that Kelly is the lone man standing between the city and another terrorist attack.
Meanwhile, Kelly has become an expert at public relations.
He has mastered the method of “stall and deflect” — until the media moves on.
To quell demonstrations after the Sean Bell killing, he asked the Rand Corporation to investigate what he termed “contagious shooting.” The Rand Corporation recommended that the department increase its use of stun guns. Stun guns?
They said nothing about how to prevent contagious shootings.
Also, not a word from them or from Kelly about the NYPD rules that allowed police undercovers to drink at the strip club where Bell and his friends held his bachelor’s party before cops opened fire.
And not a word about the lack of training and oversight that led to the shooting.
Instead, Kelly played his “misdirection” card. He ordered breathalizer tests for all officers who fire their weapons and hit someone. What bearing that has on the Bell shooting, where officers were permitted to drink at the strip club before Bell was shot, remains unanswered.