Adrian Schoolcraft: Enter The Times, Watch The NYPD Sweat
September 13, 2010
The New York Times has joined the Adrian Schoolcraft-NYPD imbroglio.
By devoting a full-column, front-page story on Friday to the whistle-blower cop, the Times has legitimized at least the tip of his police corruption charges that, until now, have appeared in the city’s tabloids, the Village Voice, and this column.
Although it may appear to hibernate for part of the year, the Times does awaken, and then beware: there is nothing more dangerous to a politician or a police commissioner who harbors political ambitions.
Remember Commissioner Ray Kelly’s stop and frisk databank? It was the Times that put it out of business two months ago, savaging Kelly’s credibility on that issue with but a few deft strokes.
On the surface, the Times’s Schoolcraft story may seem of minor import: a secretly tape-recorded roll call meeting last April, made by what the Times described as a “police supervisor,” that quoted an 81st precinct captain, saying cops had to fulfill traffic quotas or risk being fired.
Captain Alex Perez, said the Times, “can be heard warning his top commanders that their officers must start writing more summonses or face consequences. … He said each officer on a day tour should write 20 summonses a week: five each for double-parking, parking at a bus stop, driving without a seat belt, and driving while using a cell phone.”
The Times, of course, is only at the outer perimeter of the crime statistics scandal that is roiling the department.
What’s at stake is more than traffic quotas at one precinct. The Times hinted at the bigger picture.
It said Perez cited “pressure from top police officials” — indicating that the quota system was countenanced, even encouraged, from on high.
Its story added that “the recording makes clear that precinct leaders were focused on raising the number of summonses issued — even as the Police Department had already begun an inquiry into whether crime statistics in that precinct were being manipulated.”
Crime statistics being manipulated is the elephant in the room down at One Police Plaza. Downgrading felonies to misdemeanors to make city-wide crime appear lower than it actually is not confined to the 81st precinct but appears to be rampant throughout the department.
As criminologists Eli Silverman and John Eterno, a former NYPD captain, wrote recently in the Village Voice: “The ominous side is that, in order to silence dissenters and deny any problems, the NYPD continues to close its doors to any non-sponsored outside scrutiny. Yet the evidence of data manipulation is, at this point, overwhelming.”
Such downgrading has consequences for public safety that go beyond statistics.
As the Voice reported, police in Upper Manhattan downgraded the complaints of rape to misdemeanor assaults. This meant that detectives weren’t aware that a pervert was on the loose until half-a-dozen women were attacked.
Frightening in another way was the department’s response to Schoolcraft’s charges. A police posse, led by Deputy Chief Michael Marino, burst into Schoolcraft’s apartment and dragged him, against his will, to Jamaica Hospital, where he was kept in its psych ward for six days — retaliation for his corruption charges, his lawyer maintains.
When Schoolcraft subsequently fled the city and moved upstate, the department pursued him, treating him like a fugitive. They repeatedly sent cops hundreds of miles to bang on his door and threaten him with reprisals if he did not return.
An official of the local upstate police department confirmed to this reporter that the NYPD had been all over Schoolcraft’s place.
After remaining silent for a day after the Times’s ticket quota story, department spokesman Paul Browne came out with guns blazing, calling the reporting of world’s most respected newspaper “confused” and “absurd.”
Such name-calling is typical NYPD overkill when the department has been caught red-handed.