Ray Kelly: No Wind of Change
June 2, 2008
Ray Kelly sounds like a reformer whenever a crisis strikes. But outside his anti-terrorism initiatives, what changes has he made in the NYPD?
Last week at the Citizens Crime Commission, Kelly announced he had accepted all 19 recommendations of yet another panel he established, this one after the fatal police shooting of Sean Bell during a botched undercover operation in November 2006.
This panel supposedly focused on promotions, recruitment, and supervision of undercovers.
But will the public learn what these recommendations are? More important, will Kelly implement them? Or will they remain mere palaver, as we’ve seen when other police offices on Kelly’s watch shot innocent civilians or broke into their homes?
For example, what has changed in the NYPD since a housing cop accidentally shot and killed 19-year Timothy Stansbury in 2004?
Officer Richard Neri had been checking the rooftops of the Louis Armstrong projects in Brooklyn, in what is known as a vertical patrol. When Stansbury pushed open an interior stairwell door at the exact moment that Neri’s partner pulled it open from the outside, the startled Neri, his gun drawn, pulled the trigger, killing Stansbury with one shot.
Mayor Bloomberg immediately acknowledged responsibility for Stansbury’s death, braving jeers from an angry crowd to visit his family. Less than 12 hours after the shooting, Kelly held a news conference at Police Plaza. Even before the department had completed its investigation, he announced, “There appears to be no justification for the shooting.”
The city’s media praised both Kelly’s candor and Bloomberg’s seeming act of contrition as calming a potential racial explosion. Law enforcement officials throughout the city and beyond, however, were aghast at what they termed Kelly’s rush-to-judgment.
A month later, a grand jury chose not to indict Neri, ruling the shooting accidental. The Stansbury family settled with the city for $2.1 million. The incident passed into history.
But what about the practice of officers patrolling rooftops with guns drawn, even with no indicia for violence? At the time, Kelly defended the practice as common and acceptable. [Apparently it’s a carryover from the Housing Police, which was merged with the NYPD under former mayor Rudy Giuliani.]
While rooftops are havens for drug dealers and pit bulls, what about kids playing up there, or law-abiding residents using them for shortcuts across connected buildings, as Stansbury fatefully did?
Did Kelly review the policy of officers patrolling with guns drawn? If so, what did he conclude? Is the policy still in effect or did Kelly change it? Maybe there’s justification for keeping it. But he has never informed the public.
Next, let’s examine the death of Alberta Spruill, the 57-year-old Harlem woman who died in a flawed police raid in 2003. Spruill, a city employee for 29 years, suffered a fatal heart attack after a dozen Emergency Service Unit officers threw a flash grenade into her apartment. They had acted on bad information from an informant that someone was using her apartment to store drugs and guns.
This was not the first time the police under Kelly had made such a mistake, although, mercifully, it has been the only fatal incident. The previous September, police had broken down the door of a Brooklyn woman, Williemae Mack, with a similar explosive device, terrifying her and her 13-year-old twin sons, jarred awake by the crash and boom. When one of the twins hid under his bed, police pulled him out and put a gun to his head.
A month later, a retired housing cop, Richard Rogers, and his wife Marie, a retired correction captain, were watching television in their Queens home when cops broke down their door. Rogers grabbed his licensed gun and prepared to shoot at what he assumed were intruders. Seeing the cops, he dropped the gun and dove to cover it with his body so that they wouldn’t shoot him, thinking he was going to fire at them.