Releasing Raw Terror Files: Inside Dave’s Brain
August 13, 2007
So Federal Magistrate James Francis IV has ignored the bleating of Deputy
Commissioner of Intelligence David Cohen and ordered the police department
to release 600-plus pages of documents on groups it spied on before the
Republican National Convention.
Some of the NYPD’s spying reportedly occurred across the country
and even overseas.
Cohen is the former CIA spook whose most singular qualification to
head Intel appears to be the disdain for the FBI he shares with the man
who appointed him, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. Cohen had declared
in June that disclosure of any portion of the Intel’s “raw,
unevaluated” field reports would destroy its effectiveness in fighting
terrorism.
Such disclosures, Cohen argued, extended to the “case number,
date of report, unit reporting, person reporting, date, time, location
of activities being reported, description of activities, including names
of organizations and individuals monitored, topics discussed, conversations
engaged in or overheard and things observed.”
As catastrophic as Cohen claimed the release of these documents would
be, these same 600-plus pages of secret Intelligence documents somehow
turned up last May in the hands of Judith Miller, the discredited New
York Times reporter, whose claims that Saddam possessed of weapons of
mass destruction helped lead us into war in Iraq. After her reporting
back then was revealed to be have been nonsense [“You’re
only as good as your sources,” she explained], the Times pressured
her into resigning.
Meanwhile, in an article in the Wall Street Journal, Miller described
those raw, unevaluated reports as listing “numerous peaceful organizations
and individuals planning to attend the RNC, including three elected officials,
street theater companies, church groups, antiwar organizations, environmentalists
and people opposed to the death penalty.”
It is unclear how any of this related to terrorism. And you wonder
why Cohen wants to keep the reports secret?
A more interesting question is how Miller got hold of those top-secret
documents. While the NYPD denied it had given them to her, and even demanded
an inquiry into “leaks,” Miller began her Journal article
with this: “Stung by [the New York Times’ spying] criticism,
Police Commissioner Ray W. Kelly, David Cohen, the Deputy Commissioner
for Intelligence and Paul J. Browne, the NYPD press spokesman, outlined
the nature of the police department’s concerns, its conduct and
the goals of its intelligence surveillance.” O.K., Reader, you
figure it out. If you think, as Your Humble Servant does, they came from
someone way high up in the police department, isn’t it strange
the same documents are supposedly too sensitive for public perusal?
Believe it or not, Cohen’s position not to release the reports
has its supporters.